Inspired by Lanier, I envisioned myself
talking about art just as much as I allow my students production time. I
envisioned group analysis of abstract expressionist paintings, compare and
contrasts exercises of Rockwell’s Easter
Morning, 1959 with Goya’s Charles IV
of Spain and his family, 1800, historic connections between the Trayvon
Martin, Rodney King, and hoodies. Contemporary controversial artists such as
Banksy and Andres Serrano just to spark debate, and a series of really exiting
subject matter that would be great for a college environment or a perhaps
junior high setting.
The reality is that I have landed a job
at a Montessori school and I will be teaching art to a lower elementary group
ages 6 through 9. Yay! I have read plenty of Olivia Gude to feel exited and
inspired about this age group as well, but given my lack of experience in
teaching I am feeling pretty lost.
On a
Montessori classroom, art lessons emphasize process, independence, and
integration with all other content areas. Students are encouraged to think critically and work collaboratively. The
curriculum is design for the understanding of abstract, universal concepts such
as equity, freedom, and justice. Teachers are meant to serve as guides allowing
children to find their own strengths. Great! It is
the child who will decide when to work on clay or chalk, and for as long as he
desire. This is true of all activities in a Montessori classroom.
What I have so far gathered from the
preparatory educational courses at UF, Key art understandings and inquiry
should guide lesson plans which also should include the four areas of art
education: Art criticism, aesthetics, art history and art production. Can I use
a DBAE model on a Montessori classroom? Or will I have to rely on a more
traditional approach o art education that emphasizes art production?